What Is the Best Way to Grow the Business Profitably, and What Ar e the Obstacles to Gr owth?

 

Does your business need to develop new products? Does it need to take existing ones into new channels and to new customers? Does it need to acquire other businesses? How are its costs compared with those of its competitors—and what productivity programs do you have in place to improve your cost position?

In the early 1990s, GE Medical, the medical systems business of GE, hit the wall in the United States. It experienced no growth because reimbursement policies were discouraging hospitals from buying new equipment. The business unit manager, John Trani, and his team developed a growth plan to move into adjacent segments and supply maintenance and other services to owners of medical equipment, whether sold by GE or by competitors. There were obstacles: some of the non–GE Medical equipment was far removed from GE Medical’s own hightech diagnostic machinery, and the unit would have to
persuade potential customers that its proposition had value. The unit overcame the first obstacle by acquiring a company specializing in the lower-tech equipment that GE didn’t make, and by focusing on process improvement to increase the productivity of its own people. It overcame the second by taking an entrepreneurial gamble on a small hospital in Ohio: it contracted to maintain all of the equipment and guaranteed the hospital that it would save money. Once it succeeded, GE Medical was able to go to potential customers with a track record. That original growth initiative shifted a steadily increasing portion of GE Medical’s revenues into high-margin services with higher levels of cash flow.

One tool that’s useful in defining growth opportunities is market segment mapping. The tool is simple enough; any business can be segmented. Many consumer goods companies use it to great advantage. But many more don’t, and neither do all but a few industrial companies. Planners will talk about market segments, but fewer than 5 percent of the plans we’ve seen contain any useful
mapping.

To understand how it works, let’s look at A.T. Cross’s segmentation of the luxury pen market. A simple map of Cross’s market segments identifies three different consumers. The first is the individual who wants to buy such a pen for herself; the second is the person who buys one as a gift for another individual; and the third is the corporation that buys thousands, with its logo on them, and uses them as institutional gifts. For each market segment the product is essentially the same, but demand is different and so is the strategy. Each requires Cross to deal with different competitors, channels, economics, and pricing.

A new market segment in the aircraft industry has recently changed the dynamics for manufacturers and suppliers. In the past seven or eight years, as commercial airline service and schedules deteriorated and prices rose, the corporate jet business has taken off. In 1996
Executive Jets pioneered fractional ownership, which is time-sharing in the sky, with its NetJet program. The new segment it created rapidly became the fastest-growing one in the business. Among manufacturers the big winner was Bombardier of Canada, because Bombardier built planes that were right for the market—larger than
the ones made by rivals such as Beech Aviation and Cessna and smaller than those of Boeing or McDonnell Douglas, and foreign competitors.

Taken from: Execution The discipline of Getting things Done

 
 

What Is the Assessment of the External Environment?

 

Every business operates within a shifting political, social, and macroeconomic context, and the strategic plan must explicitly state the external assumptions that management is making. The leaders of a business unit have to scrutinize its environment carefully and understand it well. They should examine everything from economic and demographic trends and regulatory shifts to new technologies,
alliances between competitors, the drivers of increasing or decreasing demand for its products, and so forth. AT&T’s assessment of its external environment failed to anticipate that regulators might not behave as it hoped, and that the capital market boom in dot-coms, telecommunications, and media might not remain strong.

The general environment is the same for every player. What differentiates the successful ones are their insights, perceptions, and abilities to detect patterns of change and relate them to their landscape, industries, competition, and business. For example, when the Asian contagion hit in 1997, most companies failed to detect the change until about March 1998. GE and AlliedSignal saw it before the
end of 1997 and changed their 1998 operating plans, to be able to deliver the results they’d promised despite the new circumstances. Very few other companies responded adequately to the crisis.

How Well Do You Understand the Existing
Customers and Markets?
Perhaps not as well as you think. When it comes to industrial
customers, for example, the buying decision is more complex than just the customer’s purchasing manager who negotiates prices. The division manager of a large industrial company recently proposed a growth strategy requiring a $300 million capital investment. The strategy would adapt an existing technology to a new product that
would be sold to a new set of customers. The plan he proposed was elegant in the way it answered the usual strategy questions with data about the competition, the industry, and the external environment. The CEO listened patiently for twenty minutes, an unusually long period of time for him. However, he couldn’t wait any longer to ask the following questions. First, who buys this product? The division manager answered that it was the purchasing managers of customer companies. The CEO said, “Really? Let me rephrase the question. Who specifies that this product should be purchased?” The division manager answered that it was obviously the engineers. The CEO’s final question, delivered in a stern tone, was, “How many
engineers did you talk to?” The dead silence meant that the project was rejected.

People tend to look at their businesses from the inside out—that is, they get so focused on making and selling their products that they lose awareness of the needs and buying behaviors of their customers.

The issue is simply understanding the specific people who make the purchasing decisions and their buying behavior. At large industrial companies, for example, engineers and purchasing agents usually do the buying. But in small companies, the CFO or even the CEO will be
involved, because they have to pay close attention to cash flow. This requires taking a significantly different approach to the customer.

Taken from: Execution The discipline of Getting things Done

 
 

And this was one of her memories

 

And this was one of her memories about dining: ” It’s very odd now, what can have put that in my head ! I recollect dining once at Mrs. Bevan’s, in that broad street round the corner by the coachmaker’s where the tipsy man fell through the cellar flap of an empty house nearly a week before the quarter-day, and wasn’t found till the new tenant went in—and we had roast pig there. It must be that, I
think, that reminds me of it, especially as there was a little bird in the room that would keep on singing all the time of dinner—at least, not a little bird, for it was a parrot, and he didn’t sing exactly, for he talked and swore dreadfully; but I think it must be that. Indeed I am sure it must.”
Continue reading “And this was one of her memories”

 
 

QUESTIONS FOR A STRATEGIC PL AN (1)

 

LARRY: The strategic plans for Honeywell’s businesses give special attention to environment, competition, and why some companies in a particular business are more successful than others. A plan will start off with a database that talks about the health of the business’s environment— is it a growth market or not? If the business is in an environment that is growing at, say, a 2 percent annual rate, it is not going to grow it much above that level unless it has a new product or strategy that is truly unique. The Honeywell automotive business, for example, is in a low-growth environment, so we are cautious about our expectations for it and the amount of resources
we allocate to it.

The strategic plan then lays out the market share for that business, indicating whether it is in a leading or an insignificant position. Market share is the ultimate scorecard, and obviously it will influence the strategy. If the business’s share is small and it is in a high-growth environment, the plan will lay out what it can do to improve
market share. It will also detail whether the business has gained or lost market share in the past year.

The strategic plan also contains a short synopsis of the strengths and weaknesses of each major competitor to the business. People have to understand that the world isn’t going to watch and wave while they do something— competitors are going to do something too. In the Honeywell avionics business, the competitive analysis
focuses on companies like Rockwell Collins and France’s Thalen.

The plan then explores what kinds of companies are successful in the environment of that business. Are they low cost? Do they have innovative technologies, expansive distribution systems, a global footprint? In other words, what separates the successful companies from the other companies in the same industry?

You don’t just put a plan together and then go back and see whether it can be of help to you. Decide on the objectives at the beginning: “What do we want to get done? What are the critical issues we need to understand better? Why at the end is it going to be helpful to us?” As you fill in the plan around those objectives, you’ve got a chance to accomplish something.

A strong strategic plan must address the following questions:
• What is the assessment of the external environment?
• How well do you understand the existing customers and markets?
• What is the best way to grow the business profitably, and what are the obstacles to growth?
• Who is the competition?
• Can the business execute the strategy?
• Are the short term and long term balanced?
• What are the important milestones for executing the plan?
• What are the critical issues facing the business?
• How will the business make money on a sustainable
basis?

Taken from: Execution The discipline of Getting things Done

 
 

Who Builds the Plan?

 

To be effective, a strategy has to be constructed and owned by those who will execute it, namely the line people. Staff people can help by collecting data and using analytical tools, but the business leaders must be in charge of developing the substance of the strategic plan.

They know the business environment and the organization’s
capabilities because they live with them. They’re in the best position to introduce ideas; to know which ideas will work in their marketplace and which ones won’t; to understand what new organizational capabilities may be needed; to weigh risks; to evaluate alternatives; and to resolve critical issues that planning should address but too often doesn’t. Not everyone can learn to
be a good strategic thinker, of course. But by working in a group, guided by a leader who has a comprehensive understanding of the business and its environment, and by using the robust dialogue that’s central to the execution culture, they all can contribute something—and all will benefit from being part of the dialogue.

A good strategy process is one of the best devices to teach people about execution. It makes the mind better at detecting change; pieces of paper don’t do that. People learn about the business and the external environment— not just data and facts, but how to analyze it and use judgment. How is the plan put together? How is it synchronized? They discover insights, and develop their judgments
and intuition. They learn from mistakes: “Why, when we made our assumptions, did we not see the changes that overtook us?” Discussing these things creates excitement and alignment. In turn, the energy that these discussions build strengthens the process.

LARRY: The leader of a business has to own the strategy development. He doesn’t have a strategic planner do all the work, then come in and introduce himself to the subject the day it’s being presented. He takes responsibility for the construction of the plan and gets some help, and then—once everyone agrees with the strategy—he takes responsibility for developing action plans.

To start the planning process at Honeywell, I call the head of each unit, along with the strategic planner in his place and maybe one of the corporate staffers, and we get agreement on the critical issues confronting the plan. After the plan has been constructed, but before I review it at the corporate level, each leader will have reviewed that plan with his subordinates and gotten their input on it.
After all, these are the people who will have to implement the plan.

Taken from: Execution The discipline of Getting things Done